Negative
Polarity Items in Korean and Japanese: How Concession Works Behind
Monotone-decreasingness
(Ladusaw 1979) and non-veridicality (Zwarts 1995) are nice function
types to characterize the licensing contexts of NPIs and Free Choice
Items (FCIs) but the former fails to account for weak NPIs and the latter
for weakly negative predicates (turn off, remove, etc., see Joe and
C. Lee 2001 J/K) and emotive factive predicates (lucky, etc.)(C. Lee
1999 UCLA Working Papers). Here we propose a unified solution in terms
of concession. The majority of languages of the world such as Japanese,
Korean, Chinese, Mongolian, Hindi, Zapotec and Basque form NPIs and
FCIs by combining wh-based (otherwise, [any]-like) indefinites and concessives
that denote the notion of concession, mostly equivalent to "even"
in English (see Haspelmath 1993 [57 out of 100 languages are wh-based]
and others for facts). In all languages, the lowest indefinite natural
number "one" or a minimizer accompanied by a concessive also
forms an NPI. This type is quantitative and can be explained by Horn
(1972) and Fauconnier's (1975) scales, which, I claim, are triggered
by concession. Going down to the lower bound for the easiest (or likeliest)
on a contextually relevant scale of graded , a higher or the maximized
quantity does not hold either and the consequent emphatic total negation
is what the speaker means to convey. For the former wh-based type, which
is qualitative, concession is made by arbitrary choice. However arbitrarily,
property-wise, you may choose a member, up to maximization, from the
wh-domain (the most arbitrary way is the easiest), if it is not the
case with the relevant proposition, it is an NPI, and if it is the case
in uncertain but modally maximally possible contexts, it is an FCI,
but if it is the case in uncertain but modally existentially possible
contexts, it is a weak NPI. A wh-question is a set of alternative answers
as (true) propositions (Hamblin 1973 and Karttunen 1974) and an indefinite
from it can stand for any (arbitrary) non-specific member of the same
set (as in a choice function). I call the set of individuals etc. that
correspond to the wh-information focus a wh-domain. The wh-based NPIs,
however, are indefinite wh-forms with Concessives (CNC), not interrogative
wh-words, contrary to claims made in the literature. This talk will
show in Korean and Japanese how the notion of concession is central
to understand polarity and how compositionally as well as intensionally
polarity-related phenomena can be resolved.